5. Probability of Competition
In the pigmentation industry, the effectiveness of scarcity-based campaigns is significantly influenced by the perceived competition for the limited item, solution, or appointment time. The sense that someone else might claim the scarce opportunity before they do can drive potential buyers to act. This perception can be created on social media through two key criteria: a) visible public engagement with the campaign, evidenced by likes, shares, comments, and views, and b) certain offered items becoming unavailable during the campaign. The absence of these elements can weaken the scarcity's impact, potentially rendering the campaign ineffective.
To illustrate, consider two examples from our research. Imagine an artist with a substantial following on Instagram or Facebook offers five model seats. If the post quickly accumulates many likes, receives comments, and the artist announces that one or two slots are already taken, the offer creates a sense of urgency. The recent offer and visible public engagement can increase the likelihood of potential buyers reaching out by 50-200%. In this scenario, the scarcity is perceived as real and beneficial to the artist.
Conversely, if an artist with a smaller following posts about the "last available booking times" and the post garners only a few likes with no comments or signs of competition, the scarcity strategy may not have a positive effect. This situation is further compounded if potential customers notice similar posts with claims of "last available times," which can raise doubts about the authenticity of the scarcity. Such scenarios can turn the scarcity tactic against the artist, deterring potential customers who might associate the lack of engagement with inferior service quality or less popular solutions. The key takeaway is that for scarcity to work effectively, there needs to be a genuine perception of competition and demand for scarce resources.